<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Cambridge Student</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk</link>
	<description>The Cambridge Student Newspaper</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:26:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on MP slams lazy University students by B. Wheawell, Homerton College</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/issue/news/mp-slams-lazy-uni-students/comment-page-1/#comment-860</link>
		<dc:creator>B. Wheawell, Homerton College</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 12:26:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=4733#comment-860</guid>
		<description>Does anyone really believe Mr. Sheerman&#039;s comments are in any way directed at Oxbridge?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone really believe Mr. Sheerman&#8217;s comments are in any way directed at Oxbridge?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Eagle Pub prosecuted over poor food standards by S. Layton, Faculty of History</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/issue/news/eagle-pub-prosecuted-over-poor-food-standards/comment-page-1/#comment-857</link>
		<dc:creator>S. Layton, Faculty of History</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 13:40:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=3684#comment-857</guid>
		<description>And if poor customer service was a criminal offence, they&#039;d be up for even more charges! They turn off the heaters instead of asking you to move inside; they&#039;ll talk amongst themselves for minutes on end before acknowledging your presence at the bar; and the place is crawling with thieves operate confidently in the knowledge that their surveillance cameras are, in fact, FAKE. And yes, their beer selection and food is lousy. Bring back real pubs, with nice drinks and nice people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if poor customer service was a criminal offence, they&#8217;d be up for even more charges! They turn off the heaters instead of asking you to move inside; they&#8217;ll talk amongst themselves for minutes on end before acknowledging your presence at the bar; and the place is crawling with thieves operate confidently in the knowledge that their surveillance cameras are, in fact, FAKE. And yes, their beer selection and food is lousy. Bring back real pubs, with nice drinks and nice people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Fresher in student loan debacle by Andrea Walko, Faculty of Education - PGCE 2009 entry</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/issue/news/fresher-in-student-loan-debacle/comment-page-1/#comment-856</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrea Walko, Faculty of Education - PGCE 2009 entry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 16:22:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=3225#comment-856</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t believe what a mess the SLC has got itself into - having only got my money 2 1/2 weeks late, despite the fact I applied very early I feel sorry for the person who applied late!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t believe what a mess the SLC has got itself into &#8211; having only got my money 2 1/2 weeks late, despite the fact I applied very early I feel sorry for the person who applied late!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Selwyn College Don calls for flexible sex laws by Mark Curtis - CUSU Business Manager, Cambridge University Students&#039; Union</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/issue/news/selwyn-don-calls-for-flexible-sex-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-855</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Curtis - CUSU Business Manager, Cambridge University Students&#039; Union</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:41:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=3273#comment-855</guid>
		<description>Apologies! - We have corrected the error! :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apologies! &#8211; We have corrected the error! :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Selwyn College Don calls for flexible sex laws by frf21</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/issue/news/selwyn-don-calls-for-flexible-sex-laws/comment-page-1/#comment-854</link>
		<dc:creator>frf21</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 15:21:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=3273#comment-854</guid>
		<description>Her name is Ann Widdecombe. But it doesn&#039;t matter as she is silly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Her name is Ann Widdecombe. But it doesn&#8217;t matter as she is silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All results in: Chigbo wins by ab624</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/story_type/site_lead_story/all-results-in-chigbo-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-837</link>
		<dc:creator>ab624</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 11:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=2571#comment-837</guid>
		<description>I think its just a typo. It was the Union, not CUSU, that nearly had a black president two terms ago (actually would not have been the first but everyone assumed so). Comment then makes sense as an observation about change in Cambridge in general.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think its just a typo. It was the Union, not CUSU, that nearly had a black president two terms ago (actually would not have been the first but everyone assumed so). Comment then makes sense as an observation about change in Cambridge in general.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All results in: Chigbo wins by mww29</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/story_type/site_lead_story/all-results-in-chigbo-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-836</link>
		<dc:creator>mww29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=2571#comment-836</guid>
		<description>Oh accept my apologies...he was state schooled. Great for access.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh accept my apologies&#8230;he was state schooled. Great for access.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on All results in: Chigbo wins by mww29</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/story_type/site_lead_story/all-results-in-chigbo-wins/comment-page-1/#comment-835</link>
		<dc:creator>mww29</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 09:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=2571#comment-835</guid>
		<description>Why is the Black Students Campaign suddenly jumping on this election victory? It was never about race or minorities. Moreover, although I&#039;m sure Tom will be a magnificent President, I found the words of the Publicity Officer particularly amusing: &#039;Once upon a time, the Union was full of white public school boys but things have changed especially with the debates and guests&#039;. Well, Tom was not exactly state-schooled, plus I suspect that she is confusing the Union with CUSU. Which, of course, remains brimming with public schooled hacks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is the Black Students Campaign suddenly jumping on this election victory? It was never about race or minorities. Moreover, although I&#8217;m sure Tom will be a magnificent President, I found the words of the Publicity Officer particularly amusing: &#8216;Once upon a time, the Union was full of white public school boys but things have changed especially with the debates and guests&#8217;. Well, Tom was not exactly state-schooled, plus I suspect that she is confusing the Union with CUSU. Which, of course, remains brimming with public schooled hacks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Education Officer- elect an activist by L.J. Marks, Cambridge University Library</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/story_type/site_lead_story/education-officer-elect-an-activist/comment-page-1/#comment-834</link>
		<dc:creator>L.J. Marks, Cambridge University Library</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 22:30:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=2542#comment-834</guid>
		<description>Miss Walters&#039;s statement that &quot;all of the candidates agree with free education&quot; is not true, at least not in any meaningful sense. Something that is absolutely essential for any Education Officer who wants to restore free education - not enough, to be sure, but a prerequisite for any activism that might achieve it (or anything else) - is never, ever shutting up about it. Mr. Maltby is the only candidate who can be trusted there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Miss Walters&#8217;s statement that &#8220;all of the candidates agree with free education&#8221; is not true, at least not in any meaningful sense. Something that is absolutely essential for any Education Officer who wants to restore free education &#8211; not enough, to be sure, but a prerequisite for any activism that might achieve it (or anything else) &#8211; is never, ever shutting up about it. Mr. Maltby is the only candidate who can be trusted there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Education Officer- elect an activist by em364</title>
		<link>http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/story_type/site_lead_story/education-officer-elect-an-activist/comment-page-1/#comment-833</link>
		<dc:creator>em364</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tcs.cam.ac.uk/?p=2542#comment-833</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not going to weigh in in any length on this blog - I&#039;ve already done so over on the Varsity blog page that slates me. But I can&#039;t let JLJ&#039;s nonsense pass without comment.

Yes, JLJ Buckingham, it is very easy to claim &quot;positive results&quot; when you&#039;re acting as a cheerleader for the party in government. When you consider that the very party that Sam Wakeford is cheerleading for is the one that is planning to bring in full variable fees (which will fuck students and academics); dismantle the benefits system (which will fuck millions of ordinary people, not least many mature students); privatise large chunks of the NHS (bad for patients, workers, nurses and junior doctors); build a third runway at Heathrow (bad for everyone); and retain Tory anti-union legislation (bad for all workers, and also for student unionists, thanks to the 1994 Education Act which has survived since 1997 untouched); all the &#039;achievements&#039; of Sam&#039;s that you trumpet look pretty shoddy (Ah yes, but what about the minimum wage?, I hear you cry. What about it? It&#039;s an insult and it discriminates against young workers). What&#039;s so courageous about staunchly defending a party that shits all over students and workers, especially when that party has been in government for 12 years? Although, I&#039;ll admit, to publicly support a party that defied public opinion to launch a disastrous war based on a transparent lie - that takes some serious balls.

In terms of my achievements in Cambridge, I contributed to the campaign to save the Portuguese department from closure, which was an unambiguous success. The lecturers&#039; dispute which I helped support ground to a halt when the AUT executive accepted a sell-out deal (following the shocking harrassment of many of its members by university managements around the country).

As for the campaign for free education, which has been my major focus over the last year, no, it hasn&#039;t been successful - but neither would the approach of nicely asking the government to mitigate its attacks, which the New Labour leadership of the NUS seem to be advocating (insofar as they make any public statements or give our movement any leadership at all). But then, we are living in a climate in which the labour movement has been in retreat for around 20 years; our national union, shackled by Tory laws, is being eviscerated by New Labour apparatchiks; and the government and CBI are on the offensive on all fronts. These factors mean that, no, you&#039;re not going to see success immediately. But the fact that what Education Not for Sale is trying to do, (i.e. trying to piece together a national movement of student unions who are prepared to fight against the governments&#039; attacks on the basis of mass student involvement) is extremely difficult doesn&#039;t affect the fact that it is the only correct course of action that has any hope of bearing meaningful success for students, rather than the spurious &#039;success&#039; you allude to, which consists of basking in the dubious and reflected glory of the party of government as it systematically dismantles the welfare state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not going to weigh in in any length on this blog &#8211; I&#8217;ve already done so over on the Varsity blog page that slates me. But I can&#8217;t let JLJ&#8217;s nonsense pass without comment.</p>
<p>Yes, JLJ Buckingham, it is very easy to claim &#8220;positive results&#8221; when you&#8217;re acting as a cheerleader for the party in government. When you consider that the very party that Sam Wakeford is cheerleading for is the one that is planning to bring in full variable fees (which will fuck students and academics); dismantle the benefits system (which will fuck millions of ordinary people, not least many mature students); privatise large chunks of the NHS (bad for patients, workers, nurses and junior doctors); build a third runway at Heathrow (bad for everyone); and retain Tory anti-union legislation (bad for all workers, and also for student unionists, thanks to the 1994 Education Act which has survived since 1997 untouched); all the &#8216;achievements&#8217; of Sam&#8217;s that you trumpet look pretty shoddy (Ah yes, but what about the minimum wage?, I hear you cry. What about it? It&#8217;s an insult and it discriminates against young workers). What&#8217;s so courageous about staunchly defending a party that shits all over students and workers, especially when that party has been in government for 12 years? Although, I&#8217;ll admit, to publicly support a party that defied public opinion to launch a disastrous war based on a transparent lie &#8211; that takes some serious balls.</p>
<p>In terms of my achievements in Cambridge, I contributed to the campaign to save the Portuguese department from closure, which was an unambiguous success. The lecturers&#8217; dispute which I helped support ground to a halt when the AUT executive accepted a sell-out deal (following the shocking harrassment of many of its members by university managements around the country).</p>
<p>As for the campaign for free education, which has been my major focus over the last year, no, it hasn&#8217;t been successful &#8211; but neither would the approach of nicely asking the government to mitigate its attacks, which the New Labour leadership of the NUS seem to be advocating (insofar as they make any public statements or give our movement any leadership at all). But then, we are living in a climate in which the labour movement has been in retreat for around 20 years; our national union, shackled by Tory laws, is being eviscerated by New Labour apparatchiks; and the government and CBI are on the offensive on all fronts. These factors mean that, no, you&#8217;re not going to see success immediately. But the fact that what Education Not for Sale is trying to do, (i.e. trying to piece together a national movement of student unions who are prepared to fight against the governments&#8217; attacks on the basis of mass student involvement) is extremely difficult doesn&#8217;t affect the fact that it is the only correct course of action that has any hope of bearing meaningful success for students, rather than the spurious &#8217;success&#8217; you allude to, which consists of basking in the dubious and reflected glory of the party of government as it systematically dismantles the welfare state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
